On Nov. 30, Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D.-Calif., the new alleged spokeswoman, described the deal as a “work in progress” that lacks protection for workers and the environment. “It`s not something where we have a piece of paper that we can say yes or no to,” she said. Pelosi noted that Mexico — which inaugurated Andrés Manuel López Obrador as the new president on Dec. 1 — has yet to pass a law on wages and working conditions. The USMCA agreement, sometimes colloquially referred to as NAFTA 2.0, includes: In June 1990, Mexican President Carlos Salinas de Gortari requested a free trade agreement with the United States. In September 1990, Reagan`s successor, President George H.W. Bush, began negotiations with President Salinas on a liberalized trade agreement between Mexico, Canada and the United States. Barutciski acknowledged “that NAFTA and other investor protection agreements create an anomaly because Canadian companies whose licenses have also been revoked by the same Quebec law that expressly prohibits the payment of compensation do not have the right to pursue a NAFTA claim” and that, in this case, it would be more difficult “to obtain compensation in Canadian courts for domestic companies, because the Constitution puts property rights in the hands of national companies.
r Provinz legt”.  As early as 1984, President Ronald Reagan passed the Trade and Customs Act, which gave the president special power to negotiate free trade agreements more quickly. Canadian Prime Minister Mulroney, who strayed from Reagan`s initiative, supported the president and Canada-U.S. The free trade agreement was finally signed in 1988; it entered into force a year later. The momentum for a North American free trade area began with the United States. President Ronald Reagan, who made this idea part of his campaign when he announced his candidacy for president in November 1979.  Canada and the United States signed the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement in 1988, and shortly thereafter, Mexican President Carlos Salinas de Gortari decided to address U.S. President George H. W. Congress.
This decision would ultimately lead to legal complaints from the World Trade Organization.  The Washington Post noted that a review of the academic literature by the Congressional Research Service concluded that “the overall net effect of NAFTA on the U.S. economy appears to be relatively modest, largely because trade with Canada and Mexico accounts for a small percentage of U.S. GDP.”  From the very beginning of the negotiations, agriculture was a controversial issue within NAFTA, as was the case for almost all free trade agreements signed under the WTO […].